Cursor vs GitHub Copilot

Detailed comparison between Cursor and GitHub Copilot. Which one to choose for your project?

Our verdict

Cursor wins this comparison with a rating of 4.7/5. Cursor stands out for its best auto-complete on the market, stunningly precise.

Head to Head

Our recommendation

Cursor

The AI-powered code editor

4.7/5 (20 reviews)
Price
Free plan available
Key features
  • Ultra-fast multi-line code prediction
  • Edit code by natural language prompt
  • Ask questions about your entire project
  • Simultaneous modifications across multiple files
Try Cursor

GitHub Copilot

The AI code assistant built into your IDE

4.5/5 (227 reviews)
Price
Free plan available
Key features
  • Real-time contextual code suggestions
  • AI chat in your IDE to ask questions
  • VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, Visual Studio
  • Automatic unit test generation
Try GitHub Copilot

Cursor — Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Best auto-complete on the market, stunningly precise
  • Based on VS Code — zero-friction transition
  • Revolutionary multi-file editing via prompt
  • Generous free plan to try
  • Privacy mode for sensitive code

Cons

  • No affiliate program
  • Requires subscription for heavy use
  • High token consumption on large projects
  • Still some bugs on very large repos

GitHub Copilot — Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Perfect integration into the GitHub ecosystem
  • Support for virtually all languages
  • Free plan for students and open source
  • Largest training corpus (GitHub repos)
  • Copilot Workspace for complex tasks

Cons

  • Less precise than Cursor for multi-file editing
  • Suggestions parfois hors contexte
  • Intellectual property questions about generated code
  • Requires GitHub subscription for best features

Our choice: Cursor

The AI-powered code editor

Try Cursor