Musique IA

Suno and Udio lead text-to-song generation, producing full tracks with vocals and instruments from a prompt. Google MusicFX, built on the MusicLM research, generates instrumental clips and loops. The strongest choice depends on whether you need finished songs, background music or stems, so ai-hunter.org compares them on output quality, control and licensing.

Yes. Suno and Udio both offer free tiers with daily generation limits and, usually, non-commercial terms. Google MusicFX is free to experiment with through Google's AI Test Kitchen. Free plans suit prototyping and personal projects, but commercial rights and higher quality generally require a paid subscription, so always check the current terms before publishing.

Commercial use usually depends on a paid plan: Suno and Udio grant commercial rights on their paid tiers, while free outputs are often restricted to personal use. Copyright status for fully AI-generated audio remains uncertain in many countries, as some offices require human authorship. Read each tool's terms and your local rules before monetising a track.

Both turn text prompts into full songs with vocals. Suno is known for fast, polished and accessible results across many styles, making it popular for quick complete tracks. Udio often earns praise for audio fidelity and finer control over structure and vocals. The right pick depends on your genre and how much editing control you want, so testing both free tiers helps.

Start from your goal, not the tool. For complete songs with vocals, Suno and Udio fit best; for royalty-free background loops, Google MusicFX or dedicated stock-music generators work well. Then weigh free-tier limits, commercial licensing, export formats and editing control. ai-hunter.org reviews and compares these options by category so you shortlist two or three before committing.