Make and Zapier dominate no-code automation. But they target different users and the pricing gap is massive.
Zapier = simpler, more integrations (7,000+), more expensive. Make = more powerful, more flexible, 2-5x cheaper for the same volume.
Integrations
Zapier: 7,000+ vs Make: 1,500+. Zapier wins by a landslide. If you need to connect a niche tool, Zapier probably has the integration. Make is catching up but the gap remains significant.
Ease of use
Zapier uses a linear format (trigger → action → action). Simple, intuitive, great for beginners who just want to connect two apps.
Make uses a visual node-based builder with routers, conditional logic and branching. Far more powerful for complex workflows, but steeper learning curve.
Pricing — Make’s killer advantage
This is where Make destroys Zapier:
| Plan | Zapier | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 100 tasks/month | 1,000 ops/month |
| Starter | $19.99 (750 tasks) | $9 (10K ops) |
| Pro | $49 (2,000 tasks) | $16 (10K ops) |
Make gives you 10-13x more operations per dollar than Zapier. For any automation-heavy use case, the savings add up fast.
What about n8n?
For developers, n8n is the open-source alternative. Self-hostable, free, with JavaScript/Python code in workflows and built-in AI agents. The trade-off: you manage your own infrastructure.
n8n
Open-Source-Automatisierung für Entwickler
The three contenders
Make
Die leistungsstärkste visuelle No-Code-Automatisierung
Zapier
Die absolute Referenz für No-Code-Automatisierung
Our recommendation
| Profile | Best choice |
|---|---|
| Beginner | Zapier |
| Power user | Make |
| Developer | n8n |
| Tight budget | Make (10x more ops per dollar) |
Finden Sie das beste KI-Tool
108 Tools verglichen, getestet und bewertet. Finden Sie das passende für Ihre Bedürfnisse.
